Induced deposits with anniversary activities, and then a series of problems followed
Picture On April 9th, a friend told me that the business had an anniversary event and asked me to contact customer service to see if I had the right to participate, so I was confused and passively participated. Figure  On April 10th, the first application for withdrawal of funds failed. The customer service refused to withdraw funds on the grounds that the anniversary activities were not completed, and said that the activities that were not completed within the specified time would be handed over to the judicial department and reported for levy letter. Figure  On April 11th, I borrowed money from a friend. Due to the transfer limit, I made a deposit of 320,000 yen and completed 50% of the progress of the activity. Figure  The platform could not be accessed on April 12th and 13th, the official statement is system maintenance and upgrade; on April 14th, the deposit of 331,000 yen was completed to complete the anniversary event. Figure  On April 14th, the second withdrawal failed. The customer service asked me to pay 20% of the account balance as the violation fee on the grounds that my account maliciously attacked the platform system data and caused a high profit violation, otherwise the account will be frozen. On April 15th, deposit 342,500 yen as a deposit. Figure  On April 17th, the deposit arrived. Figure  From April 18th to 22nd, I contacted customer service about the withdrawal of funds, and I have been inquiring all the time, but there is no result; I later informed that the profit part needs to pay 50% of the account balance as personal income tax before the withdrawal can be resumed. business. Figure  On April 24th, the illegal payment was refunded to the account. Figure  On April 24, it was found that the account main body of the old version was inconsistent with the account main body of the new version. I asked customer service, the customer service explained it, and sent an email to Exness's official mailbox for verification, but no reply was received.
The following is the original recommendation